Man of Steel Movie Review
When it comes to Superman,
audiences and fans have certain expectations. But for the Man of Steel, those expectations
will be tested.
Zack Snyder’s Man of Steel, a
reboot of the Superman franchise, can be called original and a darker look at Superman.
But the interpretation may not be for everyone. As explained by the film makers
before, the telling of this story will be like the The Dark Knight films in
which it is close to reality as possible. For Superman, they tend to make him
fit into our present and what our reaction would be if we found out that an
alien was living among us. Though the changes fit their purpose, the fans may
have a different reaction to them.
When you talk of Snyder, you know
the visuals will be great. What we say in the trailers were just small amounts
on the visuals you’ll see in the film. And Snyder, like all his films, did well
on mixing reality and CGI. The effects are a bit on the dark side but it suits
the film. When it comes to the special effects on this film, it’s 10 out of 10.
Casting a film like this is quite
the task. But they managed to bring together the perfect ensemble. Henry Cavill
looks and acts the part of Superman. The first time you see him in the suit,
you will believe he is Superman. Cavill is focused on playing Kal-El in this
film that he sort of fell short on Clark Kent. From the comic books and past
films, Clark is a quiet and a clumsy guy. And he is a key part of Superman. But
in this film, we rarely see him. When Cavill comes out playing Clark in the
film, he still acts like Superman. The only time Clark is Clark is when he was
a small kid and as a teenager. Still, Cavill did a good job portraying the last
son of Krypton.
Lois Lane is another character
closely watched by fans. And Amy Adams did a remarkable portrayal of the Daily
Planet reporter. Adams manages to show us that she really is a reporter. In this
film however, Lois is not the damsel in distress. She helps Superman in a huge
way but also gets saved herself a couple of times which is true in the comic
books.
Michael Shannon gives a darker
take on General Zod. He exerts a presence whenever he comes into a scene. He puts
a militaristic side on the character this time as compared to previous portrayals.
Like his role in Ice Man, Shannon gives his character a terrorizing aura that
will be felt by the audience. His Zod is more direct at what he wants and is
more focused at his objective.
Russell Crowe’s Jor-El is a
determined and more physical portrayal. Crowe made his character different from
Marlon Brando’s. He doesn’t’ show that he is one of the smartest men on Krypton
rather than showcase his parent side. Crowe clearly conveys to the audience
that he is a caring father but at the same time caring for the future of his
people.
The cast molds the film with
their acting. Each of them has a unique chemistry with the other which greatly
helps tell the story.
Now we go to the story. As I
mentioned before, the film has a lot of changes. This is an origin story and
writer David Goyer wrote a script that reflects how Superman grew up and the
challenges he faced when he was a kid. In this film we get to see a young Clark
having trouble figuring out what’s happening to him as all his abilities come
crashing in at the same time. We see him vulnerable and scared and at time
doubtful of him. But as the story goes, he grew up to be a man of morals and a
code. During the course of the film, his morality and code will be tried and
tested.
The film is a lot darker than
past films. Some might even say too dark for a hero we all know to be a beacon
of hope and a shining example of truth and justice. Unlike Batman, The Dark
Knight rises films fit the character and the real world. Batman has his own
code even if he is a vigilante. For Superman, the film shows a dark vigilante
side to him; a far cry from the books and past films. The film makes us doubt
the hero that is Superman. The story sort of plants the seeds at his morality
and the strength of the code he lives by.
One thing I admired in the film
is that they didn’t mash everything we know of Superman into this origin story.
They just picked the factors or items that are fit to the story. Just like the
lack of Kryptonite or even Lex Luthor, but they did insert a logo and the
building of LexCorp.
But the film may be a bit
dragging to some due to the dialogues but they make it up with the fight scenes.
Also, the film will leave you with a lot of questions with regards to Superman’s
identity and how his secret is kept. It has some loop holes that may or may not
be answered in future sequels. Also a major change is the Fortress of Solitude,
Superman’s home on Earth. It appears in the film but gets destroyed at the end.
Also, the consciousness of Jor-El does live to tell Kal-El more stories about
his home world or teach him more of his abilities. The changes may make die
hard Superman fans and audiences who have followed the films question the film
or even not like it, but this is a great step for the DC Universe. This world
of Superman can be the bases for future heroes like Marvel did with its heroes.
Man of Steel may not bring
everyone’s Superman or even the Superman they expect. But the origin story
accomplishes its task of telling who Superman is before he became the hero in
red, white and blue. It may not be the Superman story we grew up to, but it
still delivers a hard punching, visually entertaining film. It may leave
questions and I’m pretty sure a lot of comments, but it is a good start for an
iconic character.
The Man of Steel may not live up
to expectations, but it delivers in excitement and more. It is a super-hero
film and it gives us that. Superman will fly again and by that time, they may
get everything right. I give it 8 out of 10.
Comments
Post a Comment